Ask a child to draw God and you will often get an old man with a white beard, sitting on a cloud. Many adults have the same picture tucked away somewhere. Some people reject God because of it. A male God, they say, was made up by men, to keep men in charge.
It is a serious charge, and it deserves a careful answer. Almost every tradition on this page says the bearded man is wrong. Jewish, Christian and Muslim teachers agree that God has no body, and so no sex. Their scriptures use “He”, but they also use pictures of mothers, wombs and nursing. And some traditions speak of God as Mother in so many words. So why “He”? Part of the answer is grammar. Part is history. And part is a real disagreement, still going on.
“As one whom his mother comforteth, So will I comfort you; and ye shall be comforted in Jerusalem.”
Isaiah 66:13 · JPS 1917
In the last chapter of Isaiah, God speaks of comforting His people like a mother comforting her child. Isaiah uses such images more than once: “Can a woman forget her sucking child…? Yea, these may forget, Yet will not I forget thee” (49:15). The prophets reached for the strongest love they knew, and it was a mother’s.
Grammar, pictures and what the words can carry
Hebrew and Arabic have no neutral word for “it” that can be used of a person. Every noun is grammatically masculine or feminine, just as a table is feminine in French. So when scripture speaks of God it has to choose, and in both languages it usually chooses the masculine form, which is also the default when the gender is unknown or mixed. Grammar is not biology.
The same languages often use feminine words for God’s nearness. In Hebrew, ruach, the spirit or breath of God that hovers over the waters in Genesis, is usually feminine. So is Shekhinah, the rabbinic word for God’s presence dwelling among people. In Arabic, the words rahman and rahim, “merciful” and “compassionate”, the words that open nearly every chapter of the Qur’an, share their root with rahim, the womb.
Language also shapes how we picture things. That is why many churches and synagogues now think carefully about the words they use. In 2023 the Church of England said it was exploring “gendered language” about God, while stating that it had no plans to abolish or rewrite its authorised services.
What each faith says
Judaism
“Can a woman forget her sucking child, That she should not have compassion on the son of her womb? Yea, these may forget, Yet will not I forget thee.”
Isaiah 49:15 · JPS 1917
Jewish teaching is clear that God has no body. Maimonides made it one of his thirteen principles of faith, and argued that every physical word used of God in the Bible, such as hand, eye or voice, is a figure of speech. That includes being male. The very first chapter of the Torah says that God created humans in His image, “male and female created He them” (Genesis 1:27). Both reflect God.
The Hebrew Bible calls God “the Rock that begot thee” and “God that bore thee” (Deuteronomy 32:18), using the verb for giving birth. Hosea pictures God teaching a toddler to walk. Many modern Jewish prayer books in English now avoid “He” where they can, while keeping the Hebrew as it is.
Christianity
“God transcends the human distinction between the sexes. He is neither man nor woman: he is God.”
Catechism of the Catholic Church, 239 · Libreria Editrice Vaticana; short quotation
Christians pray to God as Father, as Jesus taught in the Lord’s Prayer, and believe that God became human as a man in Jesus. Yet mainstream Christian teaching says plainly that God is not male. The Catechism of the Catholic Church says that God’s tenderness “can also be expressed by the image of motherhood”, and that “He is neither man nor woman: he is God”.
Jesus himself used a mother’s image: he longed to gather Jerusalem’s children “as a hen gathers her chicks under her wings” (Matthew 23:37). In the fourteenth century, Julian of Norwich wrote about “Jesus our Mother”. Christians still disagree about whether to change traditional language, and some feel strongly that “Father” must stay, because Jesus used it.
Islam
“God is more merciful to His servants than this woman is to her child.”
Sahih al-Bukhari 5999 · our rendering
In Islam, God is never called Father, and the Qur’an firmly rejects the idea that God has children of either sex. It criticises the old Arabian belief that certain goddesses were God’s daughters (53:19–23). God is beyond every likeness: “The Creator of the heavens and the earth. He hath made for you pairs of yourselves, and of the cattle also pairs, whereby He multiplieth you. Naught is as His likeness; and He is the Hearer, the Seer.” (42:11, Pickthall), and al-Ikhlas says He “He begetteth not nor was begotten. And there is none comparable unto Him.” (112:3–4, Pickthall). Arabic uses huwa, “He”, but Muslim scholars teach that this is grammar, not gender.
God is known through His Names, and the two most repeated, ar-Rahman and ar-Rahim, come from the root of the word for womb. A hadith says the womb, rahim, takes its name from ar-Rahman (Bukhari 5988). In another, the Prophet Muhammad pointed to a mother who had found her lost baby and held him close, and said God is more merciful to His servants than she is to her child.
Without religion
Many non-religious people, and many religious feminists, argue that male language for God has shaped how men and women are treated. The American theologian Mary Daly put it sharply in Beyond God the Father (1973): if God is male, then the male is God. Some people left religion over this. Others stayed and pushed for change from inside.
Sikhi
“You are my Father, and You are my Mother.”
Guru Granth Sahib, ang 103 (Guru Arjan) · our rendering
The Guru Granth Sahib opens with Ik Onkar, “One Creator”, beyond birth and beyond form. God is spoken of as both Father and Mother, and as husband and beloved, and the Gurus taught that women and men are equal before God. Guru Nanak asked why anyone would speak badly of women, since kings and everyone else are born from them (ang 473).
Hindu traditions
Hindus worship the divine in female as well as male forms. Devi, the Goddess, is honoured as Durga, Lakshmi, Saraswati and many more. In the Shakta tradition, the supreme reality itself is the Divine Mother. One well-known image, Ardhanarishvara, shows Shiva and Parvati as a single figure, half male and half female. Brahman, the ultimate reality, is a grammatically neuter word in Sanskrit: beyond he or she.
Beyond the Abrahamic faiths
Buddhism does not teach a Creator, but in East Asia the bodhisattva of compassion, Guanyin, is usually shown as a woman. The ancient Chinese Tao Te Ching calls the Way, the source of all things, their “mother”. The Bahá’í writings, like the Abrahamic scriptures, describe God as beyond any human description.
Same and different
Every tradition here agrees on the main point: God is not a man with a body. Jews, Christians and Muslims all say God is beyond male and female, though they use “He” in prayer. They differ on what to do about it. Christians keep “Father” because Jesus used it, and debate whether to add other words. Muslims never use “Father”, and speak of God through Names that hold a mother’s mercy. Jews keep the Hebrew and vary the English. Sikhs and Hindus speak of God as Mother too, in plain words. A sceptic replies that if God really were beyond gender, centuries of male-only language would not have happened. A believer agrees that the words have sometimes been misused, and answers that every word for God falls short, which is exactly why each tradition reaches for more than one.
A moment to reflect
- When you picture God, what do you see? Where do you think that picture came from?
- Isaiah and Jesus both used a mother’s love to describe God. Why do you think they chose those images?
- The Qur’an says “naught is as His likeness”. How can people talk about a God who is like nothing?
- Does it matter whether we say “He”, “She” or neither? Why?
Do it together
Read Isaiah 66:13, Isaiah 49:15, Matthew 23:37, Bukhari 5999 and ang 103. Make a chart of what each image says about God’s love. Then ask: why might the same scriptures also say “He”?
Instead of drawing God, draw something that shows God’s care: a mother bird, a sheltering tree, rain on a garden. Talk about why many faiths never draw God at all (see our page on why there is no picture).
Each person brings one name or image for God from their own tradition that is not male. Share them, and talk about how they change the way you pray or think.
Go deeper
- Catechism of the Catholic Church, 239 (Vatican) · article
- Sahih al-Bukhari 5999 and 5988 (sunnah.com) · scripture
- Guru Granth Sahib, ang 103 (SikhiToTheMax) · scripture
- Why there is no picture of God (this site) · find out more
- One God: al-Ikhlas (this site) · find out more
- Church of England to explore gendered language for God (Catholic Review, Feb 2023) · article
Sources (12)
- Isaiah 66:13, Isaiah 49:15, Deuteronomy 32:18, Genesis 1:27, Hosea 11:3: Sefaria API, JPS 1917
- Matthew 23:37: WEB (British Edition) via bible-api.com
- CCC 239: motherhood image; “He is neither man nor woman: he is God”: Vatican, Catechism of the Catholic Church, Part 1, 239
- Church of England, February 2023: exploring gendered language, no plans to revise authorised liturgies: Catholic Review (CNS), 13 Feb 2023
- Qur’an 42:11, 112:3–4, 53:19–23 (Pickthall (1930) where quoted): Quran.com
- Bukhari 5988 (rahim from ar-Rahman); Bukhari 5999 (mother and child): sunnah.com
- Ang 103 (too(n) meraa pitaa too(n)hai meraa maataa); ang 473 (so kiau mandaa aakheeai): BaniDB
- Maimonides’ principle that God has no body: Wikipedia, Maimonides’ 13 principles of faith
- Ruach and Shekhinah as feminine nouns: Wikipedia, Shekhinah
- Julian of Norwich, “Jesus our Mother”: Wikipedia, Julian of Norwich
- Shakta tradition; Ardhanarishvara; Brahman neuter: Wikipedia, Shaktism; Ardhanarishvara
- Mary Daly, Beyond God the Father (1973): Wikipedia, Mary Daly

