Imagine a friend who always knows what you will order at the café. You still choose the chips. She just knows you well. Now imagine a friend who knows everything you will ever do, before you are even born. Are you still choosing? Or are you an actor reading lines someone else wrote?
People blame God with this question in two ways. Some say: if God knew I would go wrong, how can it be my fault? Others say: if everything is already written, why bother trying? Every faith has wrestled with both. So has science, which asks a sharper version. If your brain is made of atoms that follow laws, where is the “you” who decides?
“Everything is foreseen yet freedom of choice is granted, And the world is judged with goodness; And everything is in accordance with the preponderance of works.”
Pirkei Avot 3:15 · Mishnah Yomit, Dr Joshua Kulp (CC BY), via Sefaria
Rabbi Akiva, the great teacher of the second century, packed the whole puzzle into one line, and did not try to untie it. God sees all; we still choose; and the world is judged with goodness. Jews read it in Pirkei Avot, the “Ethics of the Fathers”, often on summer Sabbath afternoons. In some editions it is numbered 3:19.
Heard in all three
“We showed him the way, whether he is grateful or ungrateful.”
Qur’an 76:3
What the brain experiments showed, and what they didn’t
In 1983 the American scientist Benjamin Libet asked volunteers to flick a wrist whenever they felt like it, and to note on a fast clock the moment they decided. A brain signal called the readiness potential began to build several hundred milliseconds before people reported deciding. Headlines said science had proved free will an illusion.
Later research has been more careful. In 2012 Aaron Schurger and colleagues proposed that the readiness potential is not a hidden decision at all. It may be the rising part of random background activity in the brain; a person acts when that noise happens to cross a threshold. Libet’s tests also used meaningless choices, flicking a wrist at no particular moment. They say little about the choices that matter, like whether to tell the truth. Libet himself thought people kept a power to veto an urge.
The argument goes on. Some scientists, such as the biologist Robert Sapolsky in his book Determined (2023), argue that genes, upbringing and brain chemistry leave no room for free will at all. Most philosophers take a middle path called compatibilism: a choice is free if it flows from your own reasons and character, even if those have causes. In a 2020 survey of professional philosophers, about 59% leaned towards compatibilism, 19% towards a stronger free will, and 11% towards none.
Watch
Watch more
What each faith says
Judaism
Rabbi Akiva’s saying holds both truths without explaining either away. The Torah insists on choice: “I have set before thee life and death… therefore choose life” (Deuteronomy 30:19). The Talmud adds a striking line: everything is in the hands of Heaven except the fear of Heaven (Berakhot 33b). God may decide a great deal about your life, but not whether you love Him.
Maimonides called free will a pillar of the Torah. Without it, he said, commandments, praise and blame would make no sense. How it fits with God’s knowledge, he admitted, is beyond us, because God’s knowing is not like ours.
Christianity
“God, who foreknoweth all things, still looks down from above, and the ever-present eternity of His vision concurs with the future character of all our acts.”
Boethius, The Consolation of Philosophy, Book V, prose 6 · H. R. James (1897), public domain
Christians have argued about this more than almost anything. Augustine said God’s foreknowledge no more forces our choices than our memory forces the past. The Roman thinker Boethius, writing in prison in about 524 while awaiting execution, gave the answer many still use. God does not live inside time as we do. He sees all of time at once, in an “abiding present”, the way someone on a tower might watch a traveller on the road below. Seeing does not make the traveller walk. “The freedom of man’s will stands unshaken,” he concluded.
Later Christians divided. Calvinists stress God’s sovereign choice. Arminians, including John Wesley’s Methodists, stress the human response. Catholics and the Orthodox say grace and freedom work together. Paul put both in one breath: “work out your own salvation… for it is God who works in you” (Philippians 2:12–13).
Islam
“Lo! We have shown him the way, whether he be grateful or disbelieving.”
Qur’an 76:3 · Pickthall (1930)
Belief in al-qadar, God’s decree, is one of the six articles of Muslim faith. The Qur’an says God has measured out everything, and also that people choose: “Say: (It is) the truth from the Lord of you (all). Then whosoever will, let him believe, and whosoever will, let him disbelieve. Lo! We have prepared for disbelievers Fire. Its tent encloseth them. If they ask for showers, they will be showered with water like to molten lead which burneth the faces. Calamitous the drink and ill the resting-place!” (18:29, Pickthall). It even sets both side by side: you may will to go straight, yet “Unto whomsoever of you willeth to walk straight. And ye will not, unless (it be) that Allah willeth, the Lord of Creation.” (81:28–29, Pickthall).
When the Prophet Muhammad’s companions asked why they should act at all if each person’s place was already written, he told them to keep going: do good, for each person will find easy the path they were made for (Bukhari 4949). A well-known report in al-Tirmidhi gives the practical rule: tie your camel, then trust in God. Muslim theologians argued fiercely here. The Mu’tazila stressed human freedom. The Ash’ari school said God creates our acts and we “acquire” them. Most Muslims hold the balance: God knows and decrees, and we are responsible.
Without religion
Many non-religious thinkers are compatibilists, like the philosopher Daniel Dennett, who argued that the freedom worth wanting is the power to act on reasons and to learn. Others, such as Sapolsky and the writer Sam Harris, think free will is an illusion. They draw a gentle conclusion from it: since no one chose their genes or childhood, we should judge less harshly and help more. Many believers notice that this sounds a lot like mercy.
Sikhi
“You yourself sow, and you yourself eat. Nanak: by the divine order we come and go.”
Guru Granth Sahib, ang 4 (Japji, pauri 20) · our rendering
Sikhs speak of hukam, the divine order that runs through everything. Nothing is outside it. Yet Guru Nanak also teaches that we reap what we sow, and that we can choose to live in tune with hukam rather than in haumai, ego. Sikhs often describe it like swimming with a river’s current instead of against it. The river is God’s; the strokes are ours.
Hindu traditions
“Meditate! And—as thou wilt—then act!”
Bhagavad Gita 18:63 · Edwin Arnold, The Song Celestial (1885), public domain
Karma is often mistaken for fate, but it is closer to the opposite. It teaches that actions have consequences, so what you do now shapes what comes next. Past karma deals you your hand; your free action decides how you play it. At the end of the Bhagavad Gita, Krishna has given his whole teaching, and then hands the choice back to Arjuna.
Beyond the Abrahamic faiths
Buddhism teaches that there is no fixed self pulling the levers, yet choice matters enormously: the whole path is training the mind, one intention at a time. The Stoics of ancient Greece and Rome taught that we cannot control events, only our response, and that this is where freedom lives.
Same and different
Every tradition here holds two things at once: there is an order bigger than us, and we answer for our choices. They draw the line in different places. Some stress God’s decree, some human freedom, some the law of karma; Buddhists question the self that does the choosing. A sceptic says: if God knew in advance, the “choice” was always going to happen, so the blame belongs to the designer. A believer replies, with Boethius, that knowing is not causing, and that God’s view of time is not ours. Nobody on this page claims to have dissolved the puzzle. Most give the same practical advice the companions were given: act, choose well, and leave the rest to God. Even people with no faith tend to agree with the first two parts. And the Qur’an adds a thought for the thankful: the way has been shown; gratitude is ours to choose.
A moment to reflect
- Think of a choice you made today. Could you have chosen differently? How do you know?
- Rabbi Akiva says “everything is foreseen, yet freedom is given”. Is that a contradiction, or a mystery?
- If brain scientists proved our choices were caused, should we stop praising and blaming people?
- The Sikh picture is swimming with the current. What would that look like in your own week?
Do it together
One student stands on a chair and describes, out loud, everything a second student does as they cross the room. Did the describer make anything happen? Use it to explain Boethius, then ask where the picture breaks down.
Talk about something you are hoping for. Make two lists: what we can do, and what we leave to God (or to chance). Pin them up for a week.
Read a short summary of Libet (1983) and Schurger (2012). Ask: what exactly was measured, and what would an experiment about a meaningful choice need to look like?
Go deeper
- Pirkei Avot 3:15 (Sefaria) · scripture
- Boethius, The Consolation of Philosophy (Project Gutenberg) · book
- Libet and free will revisited (Discover, 2019) · article
- PhilPapers Survey 2020: free will · data
- Sahih al-Bukhari 4949 (sunnah.com) · scripture
- Free will (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy) · article
Sources (12)
- Pirkei Avot 3:15 text: Sefaria, Mishnah Yomit by Dr Joshua Kulp, CC BY
- Deuteronomy 30:19: Sefaria API, JPS 1917
- Berakhot 33b: all is in the hands of Heaven except the fear of Heaven: Sefaria (paraphrased; William Davidson text is CC BY-NC)
- Boethius V.6: “abiding present”, “freedom of man’s will stands unshaken”, quotation: H. R. James translation (1897), Project Gutenberg 14328
- Philippians 2:12–13: WEB (British Edition) via bible-api.com
- Qur’an 18:29, 81:28–29, 76:3 (Pickthall (1930) where quoted): Quran.com
- Bukhari 4949: each person made easy for what they were created for: sunnah.com
- Libet (1983); Schurger et al. (2012) reinterpretation; arbitrary choices: Neuroskeptic, Discover, 21 Sept 2019
- PhilPapers 2020: compatibilism 59.2%, libertarianism 18.8%, no free will 11.2%: PhilPapers Survey 2020
- Japji pauri 20 (aape beej aape hee khaahu): BaniDB, ang 4
- Gita 18:63: Arnold, The Song Celestial, Project Gutenberg 2388
- Maimonides on free will (Laws of Repentance 5): Wikipedia, Free will in theology

